Home page
<<Back to index
‘I’m a very different person now’
By ANNE SIMPSON
Comment | Read Comments (113)

The First Minister has tidied away the washing from the kitchen pulley in his Wishaw home, and now, as we sip coffee at the pine table, looking out on to the garden's spring shimmer, he remembers the curious incident of the picture show in the night. It was one of those rare occasions when Jack McConnell and his wife Bridget managed to snatch time to go to the movies. "We'd decided on Pride and Prejudice at the Barrbridge Leisure Centre in Coatbridge, but first we went for a meal at an Italian restaurant nearby."

As the couple tucked into their pasta they couldn't help noticing the unusual number of men dining together or mooching about the complex itself. "By the time we'd finished, Pride and Prejudice had just begun so the cinema was in absolute darkness and the only available seats were right at the front. Anyway, at the end of the film, which we both enjoyed very much, I was conscious - as ever - that there might be one or two people who'd like to say hello. So, the lights came up and as we turned around I discovered that every single person in the audience was female except me."

Amid laughter, McConnell did indeed shake a few hands, and suddenly the reason for the Coatbridge gender division became clear. The women had left their men outside to avoid any conspicuous yawning over Jane Austen. Clearly West-of-Scotland-Man has yet to cop on to the pulling power of Mr D'Arcy.

McConnell is often criticised for his " wooden demeanour" on public occasions yet those who know him well explain this as a natural shyness, not the handiest attribute in a politician. But freed from the Scottish Executive's coalition straitjacket, he now feels more at ease with himself, traversing the country on the trail of May 3 votes.

That's not to say the Labour leader hasn't enjoyed being First Minister. But the constraints required of him in the Holyrood chamber have, he feels, sometimes presented "a very boring representation of me, which isn't me at all". This, he acknowledges, is partly a consequence of his responsibility to the office he holds, to respect the Parliament rather than indulge in punchbag politics. If nothing else, such restraint drives home the actual limitations of power; something any successor - should there be one - will quickly discover.

Is he thinking of Alex Salmond? "Well, I enjoy having an opponent who is taken seriously because - put it this way - it makes the contest more meaningful, but I passionately believe I am a better First Minister than he would ever be." McConnell has always been convinced that, of his generation, he was the person best equipped to hold the role. "And I still believe that."

But set aside the school examinations fiasco of 2000, and, as education minister, he had no real knowledge of the unremitting pressures which crowd into the top job. "Donald (Dewar), was an iconic figure with an idiosyncratic style and vast experience, which benefited us all. But it's fair to say that for the first year and a half that I was in the job, I found it incredibly tough."

That particular period, he reflects, coincided with health service waiting lists deteriorating and no demonstrable improvement in schools. "We'd also gone through a mini recession in electronics, and the Scottish economy was stuttering. The drug rehabilitation programme was only just coming on, so I felt frustrated at the lack of progress and change." McConnell muses that he shouldn't have taken things so personally. "But I did, and it dented my confidence for a while. On reflection, though, I've kind of gone on a personal journey in this job, and I feel I'm now a very different person from the one during those first 18 months."

Certainly the hair is greyer and the suits are better cut, but in what other ways does McConnell believe he has altered? "Well, my confidence in my own abilities has grown because of a clarity of direction. As soon as I was able to break out and set my own agenda at the 2003 election, and then get to work on that, I became like a liberated person. And I've been able to deal with the day-to-day abuse that comes with the job by looking at the results."

McConnell had decided that there were things that could no longer be swept under the carpet. Chief among then were sectarianism, smoking and Scotland's need for immigrants to redress a declining population. But each of those subjects was risky, and he recalls that there were many people, both inside and outside the Parliament, who counselled against the initiatives he intended.

Was Bridget among them? McConnell shakes his head. His wife, an admired high-flyer, is executive director of Glasgow City Council's cultural and leisure services, the original mover and shaker behind the triumphant restoration of Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum and now involved in Glasgow's bid for the Commonwealth Games. "You know, Bridget in her work takes brave decisions and actually we've got quite similar personalities, so we're complementary in that sense. We feed off each other and we learn from each other. In fact we're much more a team than a couple in competition."

I am a better First Minister than Alex Salmond would ever be … my confidence in my own abilities has grown since 2003

But in a small country their relationship has had to survive an unprecedented level of scrutiny, some of it fuelled by malice. The first occasion was five years ago when McConnell became Labour leader, and whispers of an adulterous past swirled around him. As a result he was persuaded - some claim by Bridget - to admit publicly to an affair seven years previously that then threatened to ruin his chances of becoming Scotland's third First Minister. Anyone who witnessed that televised moment of skeletons being laid to rest, can't have failed to observe Bridget McConnell's unwavering dignity in facing down that ravenous press conference. She expressed no bitterness, but hurt was there, not the old, inevitable hurt of infidelity - the couple, she said, had rebuilt their marriage with the support of trusted others. Instead, the hurt that haunted that occasion was more the spite and innuendo that always seem to lurk in any corridor of power.

"We have this huge extended family of 57 relatives," says McConnell, "and they at times have felt every blow. But not one of them has ever said to me: I wish you weren't First Minister.' Yet I know for a fact that the ups and downs of this job affect almost every one of them." That was certainly true on the second occasion of media outrage when the McConnells spent New Year at the Majorcan villa of Kirsty Wark and her husband in 2005.

Given the nature of Wark's Newsnight job as a political interrogator, that festive break was perceived as an error of judgment by both sides. But it also raised the testy question of whether public figures are wise to have any friends at all. "At the time I got quite angry about that whole episode because it was so destructive to people other than us. We've been close friends of Alan Clements and Kirsty for 20 years. They are among the kindest and strongest people I know, and we're very fond of them." But since all that livid coverage the couples haven't holidayed together, a decision they took jointly.

"So we've had to pull back from that friendship and initially the thing that was worst was the sheer hypocrisy of some of those who were criticising us but who themselves holiday with politicians.

The impact on the kids, though, was harshest. I mean, Hannah and Mark are much older than Caitlin and James, Kirsty and Alan's children. The four of them have always got on really, really well but now we are in the ridiculous situation where the four of them haven't been on holiday together for three years."

But if anything convinced McConnell that the slings and arrows of high office were a universal affliction, it was a late-night session in the bar at Gleneagles during the G8 summit. "There were about 10 of us including Bush and Chirac, and Bridget with some of the wives." Tony Blair had gone upstairs to deal with the horrific aftermath of the London bombs, and Italy's Silvio Berlusconi was also elsewhere, "But it was just a group with similar heavy levels of responsibility, having a chat in probably one of the few places where they could relax. I was very struck by that because I rarely relax when I'm out, maybe in a restaurant, as there have been incidents where people have tried to pick an argument or whatever."

McConnell was determined that there should be some lasting result of Scotland's hosting of the summit, and the re-invigorating of infrastructure expertise for impoverished Malawi continues as the goal. But that night, when banter was flying over the nightcaps of the powerful, the First Minister introduced a little mischief. Before arriving in Scotland the French president had derided British food, anticipating the worst, only to swallow his prejudice on sampling the Gleneagles fare. So, McConnell went to the hotel kitchens and brought Chef Andrew Fairlie into the gathering.

"Chirac took the encounter in great spirit, and congratulated Andrew with warmth and style. But, you know, when you see these guys behind the scenes, they are the same as the rest of us."

Yet, off the official circuit, how do the McConnells chill out?

"At heart Bridget and I are both country people, and we chose this house because of the peacefulness of the back garden. Look out of the window, and you could be in Balfron.

"So, when I manage to get back here in the evening we just talk and go for a wander in that garden, listening to the birds. And the security lights help when you decide to do a bit of moonlight weeding."

If, on May 3, the fates decree that McConnell will no longer be First Minister, he would like to resume a career working with children. "I wouldn't go back to teaching, but something focused on improving young people's opportunities." But such thoughts are premature, he says. While some politicians have recently been described as "attack dogs", Jack McConnell may be more of a border terrier - tenacious and quick with that burrowing determination to see things through.

12:01am Saturday 21st April 2007

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: Stevie on 8:53pm Fri 20 Apr 07
Nah yer exactly the same person Jack. Going home for the weekend and visiting the cinema doesn't really cut the mustard. Do you like mustard? It's yella tae.

Until Scots like you start saying no to Westminster on grounds of putting Scotland first yer out on yer arse Jackie boy.
Posted by: alastair, south of the border down engerrland way on 10:02pm Fri 20 Apr 07
May I suggest that every sensible person goes to a link page of the new zealand herald http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10360042 reads it, takes a copy of the page and includes the nz herald link, together with www.scottishenterpriseparty.org/thegreatdeception and uses their Outlook to e-mail to all those in their mailing list with the request that the recipient reads and forwards the e-mail to those on their mailing list. In a matter of hours the entire electorate of scotland who have access to e-mail will have received the information. I believe that it takes only 16 repetitions to (ie 16 to power 16) to get the info round the world. Might be a problem though - Poodle Bliar, his henchmen (Broon, Straw & Alexander)and his lamp post in chief Mr Joke McConnell might declare a risk to national (unionist labour) security and make an emergency order to close down the internet in britain for the period of the holyrood hustings. BTW, Why do I describe Joke McConnell as Bliar's Lamp post? Well, we all know that Bliar is Dubbya's poodle who's led about, and what does a male poodle do when out for a walk? It finds a lamp post and pees on it!!!!
Posted by: alastair, south of the border down engerrland way on 10:06pm Fri 20 Apr 07
May I suggest that every sensible person goes to a link page of the new zealand herald http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10360042 reads it, takes a copy of the page and includes the nz herald link, together with www.scottishenterpriseparty.org/thegreatdeception and uses their Outlook to e-mail to all those in their mailing list with the request that the recipient reads and forwards the e-mail to those on their mailing list. In a matter of hours the entire electorate of scotland who have access to e-mail will have received the information. I believe that it takes only 16 repetitions to (ie 16 to power 16) to get the info round the world. Might be a problem though - Poodle Bliar, his henchmen (Broon, Straw & Alexander)and his lamp post in chief Mr Joke McConnell might declare a risk to national (unionist labour) security and make an emergency order to close down the internet in britain for the period of the holyrood hustings. BTW, Why do I describe Joke McConnell as Bliar's Lamp post? Well, we all know that Bliar is Dubbya's poodle who's led about, and what does a male poodle do when out for a walk? It finds a lamp post and pees on it!!!!
Posted by: martin on 10:14pm Fri 20 Apr 07
"It was a document that could have changed the course of Scottish history. Nineteen pages long, written by Scottish economist Gavin McCrone, presented to the Cabinet office in April 1975 and subsequently buried in a Westminster vault for 30 years.

McCrone's paper, written for Ted Heath's Tory Government and only just released under the Freedom of Information Act, revealed how North Sea oil could have made an independent Scotland as rich as Switzerland.

Earlier this week, Chancellor Gordon Brown underlined the vital revenue stream that North Sea oil still is in the context of British politics.

In his pre-Budget report, Brown extracted an extra £6.5 billion (NZ$16 billion) in tax from North Sea oil and gas producers, to be taken over the next three years. Imagine then, what the oil could have done for a Scotland which chose independence in the mid-1970s and claimed ownership.

Thirty years ago, McCrone's conclusions shocked his political masters. An independent Scotland's Budget surpluses, wrote McCrone, would be so large as to be "embarrassing". Scotland's currency "would become the hardest in Europe with the exception of the Norwegian kronor".

Scotland would be in a position to lend heavily to England, a situation that could last "for a very long time".

The study was judged incendiary by London and classified secret. The mandarins demanded that McCrone's analysis be given "only a most restricted circulation in the Scottish Office because of extreme sensitivity".

It was the comparison with Norway that particularly worried. In the mid 1970s, Norway was fully independent and about to take advantage of an oil boom that has generated huge prosperity to the present day.

In Scotland, however, heavy manufacturing was in deep trouble. Between 1970 and 1974 the number of coal mines in Scotland slumped by a third, while steel production fell by a fifth.

The Government refused to bail out four shipyards in Upper Clyde in 1971, leading to a work-in by unionists and a march by 70,000 people.

And so the call for independence became louder. The 1970 general election saw the Scottish Nationalist Party poll just 11.4 per cent of the vote and one seat. By the 1974 election their support had risen to the all-time high of 30.4 per cent of the vote, and 11 seats.

American firms became nervous that a Scottish breakaway, socialist in outlook, was threatening their interests. Would-be "direct action" cells began to emerge across Scotland.

McCrone's report, in such volatile circumstances, would almost certainly have provoked a turning point.

Billy Wolfe, who was leader of the SNP at the time, is in no doubt of what the findings could have meant - "winning" Scotland in the 1974 election.

Such was the fear of Scottish nationalism that the study remained secret under Callaghan, Thatcher, Major and even Blair.

Alex Salmond, the current SNP leader, said McClone's papers would form a central part of their campaigning for the future.

"It would have had great influence. I was appalled at the extent of what has been hidden from the people.

"The impact would have been dynamite. This is hugely important. But it was not just important then. It is important now. Gordon Brown's black hole is being filled by black oil."
"
Posted by: James Brown, Ayr on 10:58pm Fri 20 Apr 07
If Mr McDonnell is serious about tackling sectarianism then he should stop Labour HQ poison dwarves (otherwise known as drones) from posting inflammatory provocative remarks on Catholic schools in the comments pages of The Herald and The Scotsman. Recent manifestations were Steve of Clydebank and Pete of Barrhead in yesterday's article on the Green Party.
Posted by: John on 12:02am Sat 21 Apr 07
This crap would bring tears to a glass eye. While he's swanning about with the great and good in Gleneagles child poverty in Scotland is getting worse and pensioners are just about scraping enough money to pay their Council Tax. Oh and some of these people can't afford to go on holiday unlike McConnell and his pal Kirsty.
Posted by: Brian Blessed, Glasgow on 12:09am Sat 21 Apr 07
Forget Trident, pensions, education, the Olympics, Independence, the economy, taxation, democracy, the NHS, student finance, Iraq, Cash for Honours and all the rest of it. What I need to know is:

Did McConnell stand his round at the bar with Bush and Chirac? This could potentially change my vote.
Posted by: Gregor Addison, Scotland on 12:15am Sat 21 Apr 07
Aw! A wee feel good story about Jack. That's nice. He's a different person since he slipped out of his coalition strait jacket. Oh, look - there's Nicol holding it for him until he's ready to put it straight back on again.
Posted by: Alex Porter, Madrid on 1:22am Sat 21 Apr 07
If he's so much better when he's not First Minister, we have a responsibilty to keep him that way, no? Ach, he's just a wee boy so he is.
Posted by: Fiona27k, Dunfermline on 1:27am Sat 21 Apr 07
In fairness, at least Jack McConnell is human and has a life. Alex Salmond gives the impression of being not just wooden, but positively stoney.

Jack represents Scotland, and is a talented guy, proud to lead his country, and I'd say he's done a grand job of it.

Much as I love Scottish fish, I hope Salmon and Sturgeon aren't on the menu after May 3rd. If they hang around too long they'll go rotten!
Posted by: Tricia, Newington, Ed. on 1:28am Sat 21 Apr 07
Peewww! Smells Fishy! 5% local income tax with the snp does stink!
Posted by: Clare, Labour Astroturf Dept. on 1:35am Sat 21 Apr 07
I agree with the 2 previous women, who are now located in reasonably safe Labour seats as opposed to marginals as before (does that indicate a fall in our... I mean, Labour's support I wonder).

Given the fact I emailed them the text of what to say, they better bliddy agree with me!

Love,

Clare/Mike/Sandra/Tricia/Fiona/Jane
Posted by: Frances on 2:16am Sat 21 Apr 07
Sorry if this sounds humourless, but it really needs to be pointed out for casual readers that "Fiona" and "Tricia" do not exist, and are in fact one in the same person. This happens night after night, always with different names, always "two women" popping up almost simultaneously to agree with each other about how awful the SNP is. One or the other will typically use a variation of the phrase "in all fairness", to make it sound like it is the casual viewpoint of an 'ordinary member of the public', rather than that of a Labour minion.
Posted by: Edward, Edinburgh on 2:34am Sat 21 Apr 07
We have had FIVE years of you Jack, Five out of the total EIGHT years that Labour and the Libdems have been in power, Somehow I dont think, we will have a different Jack for another four years, it doesnt even bear thinking about. Suggest you get used to going to the pictures more often with your wife and taking up a hobby. Youve made a mess of governing Scotland, I certainly dont want you back
As Mr Alan Sugar would say ' Sorry Jack , your fired!'
Posted by: Gordon, USA on 3:43am Sat 21 Apr 07
Joke McConnell is in denial, going by the tone of this article. To quote the words of the Bard - "Oh wad some power the gift tae gie us . . ."
Posted by: donald anderson, glasgow on 5:38am Sat 21 Apr 07
'I'm Mr McDonnell'
Posted by: Vronsky, This Planet on 8:22am Sat 21 Apr 07
*sob* You'll tell them, won't you Anne - I'm really nice *sob* not bad at all - that Mr Salmond -he's *sob* the bad one - he's a bad man. I'm *sob* nice and soft and fluffy - tell them Anne - and *sob* if I *choke* lose my job to that bad man *sob* tell them I'll be noble *sob* I'll do something to chilren - no - make that 'working with children' - I was good - wasn't I Anne? Not bad - not really, really bad - and I wasn't bad to my wife not really Anne - and those torure flight things - that was just a bit of fun - they can't *sob* blame me, can they Anne? You'll tell them won't you? And that silly war - wasn't me, was it Anne? I mean, I'm nice, I wouldn't - and they were only Arabs, weren't they Anne *giggle* - or maybe don't say, maybe not tell them those bits, Anne. Just *sob* how I'm nice, and sweet, and *sob* did we get the children bit in? - and not bad at all, not bad like that bad Mr Salmond. You'll tell them won't you Anne? Write it down *sob* look *sob* take one of my crayons, *scream* no, not the yellow one - and *sob* write it *sob* *sob*...
Posted by: John F on 8:23am Sat 21 Apr 07
‘I’m a very different person now’ I hope you are Mr MConnell because:-
According to an internal document obtained by The Observer, Jack McConnell's major achievements during his 5 years as First Minister are:
The Fresh Talent initative and the reverse of Scotland's population decline
Banning smoking in enclosed public spaces in Scotland
Taking measures to reduce sectarianism
Continuing aid to Malawi

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,,1951864,00.html#article_continue

P.S.Nearly a third of the £2m spent on Scotland's Malawi programme has gone on running costs, rather than helping those in need, BBC Scotland has found.
The amount is about five times the running costs for similar work carried out by a Westminster department
Posted by: Frank McBride, lusitania on 8:44am Sat 21 Apr 07
Is this an apologist I see before me?

Compare and contrast the statements of Brian Dempsey with to Alex Salmond and Jack McConnell.

Says it all! These were objective statements not personal self-glorification.

FOR A FAIRER MORE PROSPEROUS SCOTLAND.

VOTE SNP 1st, 2nd, 3rd. ON 3 MAY.
Posted by: R MacLeod, London on 8:54am Sat 21 Apr 07
What an absolute load of drivel , a progoganda piece on the Jack Whatshisname .
The man is useless ,even the bit about the smoking ban, he stole the bill of Stewart Maxwell of the SNP .
Maxwell originally introduced the bill which Labour rejected , then put their name on it and took the glory for it.
This lot are as dishonest and as corrupt as anything that was behind the Iron Curtain , but guess what Unionist drones.......
The Berlin Wall came down and communism ended so will unionism .

Posted by: Oscar on 9:23am Sat 21 Apr 07
Bear in mind that this piece of fluff was written by Anne Simpson whose Saturday Herald article just last week assassinated Salmond, in one of the most insiduous pieces of protectionist journalism in many a year.

Where's the impartiality Anne?

http://election.theherald.co.uk/homepage/electionfocus/display.var.1314656.0.0.php?act=complaint&cid=181280
Posted by: Mac, Dundee on 9:44am Sat 21 Apr 07
Simply a piece of Labour propaganda. Cr@p journalism from a newspaper that's becoming more like the in-house magazine for New Labour.
Posted by: RabMac, A Sense of Injustice on 9:59am Sat 21 Apr 07
Anne Simpson...................yer a sleverin' wee jobbie o' a journalist, full o' pro-McCON guff and sentimental drivel. Get a real job !!
Aye......an' we dinna forget last weeks scurrilous attacks oan Wee Eck...................balanced journalism??......................... my erse.
BTW........ah'm No' in the SNP...bit yer STILL a wee jobby !!
Posted by: Rob, EH7 on 10:01am Sat 21 Apr 07
This newspaper is entitled to support whoever it likes, of course, but the contrast between today's McConnell puff piece and last week's (admittedly ineffectual) character assassination on Salmond does not read well. I really have to ask - do you people want to sell your paper to anyone but the Labour faithful? If so, you might care to print some objective journalism occasionally.
Posted by: Doctor in charge, ward 27k, At the bedside on 10:20am Sat 21 Apr 07
Fiona27k wrote:
In fairness, at least Jack McConnell is human and has a life. Alex Salmond gives the impression of being not just wooden, but positively stoney. Jack represents Scotland, and is a talented guy, proud to lead his country, and I'd say he's done a grand job of it. Much as I love Scottish fish, I hope Salmon and Sturgeon aren't on the menu after May 3rd. If they hang around too long they'll go rotten!
Now now Fffffiona! Visiting time is over. More toe-ing the party line from Labour HQ? You say, "At least Joke McConnell is human"???? At the very MOST he's human...that's about it. Vote Joke McConnell... he's human. Satchi & Satchi needs you. I'd rather have Salmon & Sturgeon than a rotten box of fish heads.
Now is the hour.
Posted by: Oscar on 10:22am Sat 21 Apr 07
Anyone notice in yesterday's Scotsman front page

http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=607172007

(and three pages inside )interview with Blair, that he failed to make any mention of McConnell?

Very odd that in this fluffed up piece of 'gaze in awe at the wonder of me', Blair makes no mention - not a single mention - of wee Jack McConnell.

This election isn't about Blair or Brown neither are candidates. Yet McConnell their candidate, nor any of the illustrious cabinet fail to find mention. Ho hum.
Posted by: David McNicol on 10:27am Sat 21 Apr 07
Phew! Did this article somehow get diverted from Hello! magazine? Now that he has had his cup of tea and put away his washing, perhaps he can tell us his opinion on the impact of the McCrone report and the difference that it has made to secondary education in Scotland?
Posted by: Geezafag, Inside on 10:28am Sat 21 Apr 07
John F wrote:
‘I’m a very different person now’ I hope you are Mr MConnell because:- According to an internal document obtained by The Observer, Jack McConnell's major achievements during his 5 years as First Minister are: The Fresh Talent initative and the reverse of Scotland's population decline Banning smoking in enclosed public spaces in Scotland Taking measures to reduce sectarianism Continuing aid to Malawi http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,,1951864,00.html#article_continue P.S.Nearly a third of the £2m spent on Scotland's Malawi programme has gone on running costs, rather than helping those in need, BBC Scotland has found. The amount is about five times the running costs for similar work carried out by a Westminster department
Banning smoking in enclosed public spaces...This is the reverse of normality. As a great writer once said,"You go outside for some fresh air...outside is meant to have clean air...inside isn't." When I go outside from my stuffy office, I want clean air, not smoky air. I say reverse this now. Allow smoking indoors and keep the streets fresh.
Posted by: David Nummey, London on 10:29am Sat 21 Apr 07
I agree that this story was very sympathetic. As an SNP supporter, I don't doubt that Mr McConnell is a talented individual, and I think that some of the abuse he takes is unfortunate.

However, I think that Alex Salmond and the SNP have significantly more to offer Scotland than the previous executive. On grounds of fairness, it would sem to me that the Herald should also offer a similarly sympathetic portrayal of Mr Salmond.
Posted by: somerferg, Oz on 10:30am Sat 21 Apr 07

This piece of tripe should come with a sickbag.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 11:02am Sat 21 Apr 07
My god. 'The Scotsman' does it again.

Tell me, is it still Mike Gilson up there as chief editor? You know - ex-editor of the Portsmouth Gazette or some-such.

Apologies in advance if I'm wrong on that.

Nevertheless, other than the free vomit back you should have had accompanying this absolute sugary-sweet, transparently obvious pro-Labour crap, can we expect a lovely wee piece on Mr.Salmond at some point?

You know - a 'between the lines' special. Why 'Alex' has grown in stature, why many leading politicians and businessmen say he's the ticket, why he's very likely to come round and make wee cups of tea for your granny and help her with the messages?

Jack McConnell has the personality of a clootie dumpling, the charisma of a bag of spanners - and - importantly, TAKES HIS ORDERS FROM LONDON.

Get used to:

'Sorry, that question is a matter for the Westminster govt.' for another four years if this gutless wretch - a person that embodies everything that's just WRONG about 'Scotland the Brave' gets in.

Scottish people - be brave! It's easy! Scotland WILL NOT crash and burn! That - as the greater world knows, is absolute NONSENSE.

DO NOT be taken in by this patronising labour mix of scaremongering, 'ye cannae dae that' and 'Jack's alright'.

Take your own steps, don't doom our kids to a dependancy culture, don't let THEM have to listen to scare stories about reliance on England etc It's 2007 for god's sake!

In the meantime, I'll pin this shining example of how Scotland's editorial pride seems to be going the way of the dodo.

Whilst further struggling to understand why every newspaper in Scotland wants to alienate nationalist readers - and why people aren't saying more about it.

Is there an implication there's nothing positive to report about the SNP policies that seem to be winning the most popular support - ermmmm, in Scotland.

A free bottle of Whisky to the first gutless Clyde/Forth valley newspaper with the courage to actually embrace anything approaching balanced reportage.

Scotsman - you sicken me. Indeed, you sicken many.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 11:05am Sat 21 Apr 07
Oh - in my 'dumbstruckness' forgot to pin the URL - http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=601082007 - read and despair.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 11:11am Sat 21 Apr 07
Wow - it's finally happened.

The distinctive editorial tones of Scotsman/Herlad have finally merged into a single form of gelatinous, gooey, pro-labour garbage.

Scotsman postings on the Herald site.

Herald postings on the Scotsman site.

Six of one, half-dozen of the other...

Apologies! It's getting difficult to 'see the difference' between their bold editorial stances.
Posted by: david el escocés, Málaga on 11:16am Sat 21 Apr 07
This is to journalism as Mother Theresa is to Deep Throat.
Posted by: david el escocés, Málaga on 11:21am Sat 21 Apr 07
Just saw the following on AFP. Interesting?

By Robin Millard AFP - Saturday, April 21 LONDON (AFP) - Close allies of British Prime Minister Tony Blair are set to be charged in the "cash for honours" row that has tainted his final year in office, newspapers said Saturday.
Posted by: James Crozier, Glasgow on 11:24am Sat 21 Apr 07
The Herald really needs to start employing real journalists not Labour party hacks and when wee jack comes out of hospital after having Anne Simpson removed from his arse he will still continue to be a useless joke....
Posted by: Alex Porter, Madrid on 11:45am Sat 21 Apr 07
instant Adbo (anti-democratic behaviour order) nomination for Anne Simpson. You are charged with character assassination of one party leader and fawning, psychophantic rebranding of another. Officer, take this so-called journalist to jail.
Posted by: Neil 9% Growth, Glasgow on 11:53am Sat 21 Apr 07
He may be a different man but he still says the same things. Just before the last election he assured us that the economy would be his "number one priority". He was also on record as having listed a number of other things as being "first" or "number one" priorities.

In March he also promised us that this time the economy would again be his "number one priority".

In fact in the last 4 years the economy has continued its abysmal 1.5% growth rate, 1% less tahn the UK average. Had he kept this promise he would not now be facing defeat.
Posted by: Robert Dickson on 12:16pm Sat 21 Apr 07
How much does it cost to place a self serve personal ad in the Herald?
Posted by: Boaby, Glasgow on 12:59pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Nauseating drivel. I stopped buying The Herald along time ago because of this type of garbage.
Posted by: I'm no really here on 1:19pm Sat 21 Apr 07
The Labour Part seems to be going in for "Look I'm actually a Family Man" today. Here is more crap, this time about Tony and Cherie. Two such articles on the same day - coincidence's? - I don't think so.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2467343.ece
Posted by: Jack McConnell, Edinburgh on 1:40pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Now that's what I call a well-written article. I have more human warmth in my pinky finger than big gub Salmond has in his whole body. Vote Labour on the 3rd to ensure Scotland remains the best small region in the UK.
www.myspace.com/jackmcconnell
Posted by: Jack Gray, Glasgow on 1:44pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Different, McConnell? Are you f***. My god the marching powder must have been in complete overkill here. You're different alright by believing in magic carpets, and delusions of grandeur. Is that what you used to work out to counter the SNP's claims of how they will fund the Income Tax? The hypocrite finally speaks at last.

#WHAT A WASTE (DA, DA, DA, DA-DA-DUM), Ian Dury And The Blockheads, May 1978, Stiff Label.
Posted by: Jack Gray, Glasgow on 1:50pm Sat 21 Apr 07
# I've had enough of reading things from neurotic, psychotic, Pig-headed politicians, all I want is the truth. Just Gimmie Some Truth. John Lennon, 1971, Apple Records.

This is just to tell you what you can do with you vote McConnell. Stick it up your arse.
Posted by: durruti, head of the column on 2:02pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Oh come now, some of the reactions to this heartwarming portrait of Mr. McConnell can only be described as churlish. Indeed they are reminiscent of the 'day-to-day abuse', 'malice' and 'spite' to which Ms Simpson alludes in this uplifting article.

This is a vividly written piece which shows a man equally at ease with the ladies of Coatbridge and his fellow world leaders such as M. Chirac and President Bush. A man who practises statesmanship but can still find time to take the washing off the pulley or do some midnight weeding with his devoted high-flying wife. Ms Simpson's contrast of domestic idyll with the cares of running a country give us a marvellous insight into McConnell the man.

Yes, there have been difficult times for the McConnells but these burdens have been bravely borne and Scotland's First Couple have emerged all the stronger. Should the unthinkable happen and Mr McConnell find himself out of office after May 3rd, then he will even take up a career helping the children of Scotland. What could be nobler?

Thank you, Ms Simpson, for giving us this insight into a genuinely good and caring man. You must have found it a difficult task, for as you note, Mr McConnell suffers from 'a natural shyness' and must therefore have been extremely reluctant to talk about himself.

Thank you again Ms Simpson for an article which exemplifies the standard of journalism which we have come to expect from the Herald.
Posted by: Brian Blessed, Glasgow on 2:02pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Compare the article above with Simpson's interview with Salmond:

http://election.theherald.co.uk/homepage/electionfocus/display.var.1314656.0.0.php

A bit of a difference then.
Posted by: malky, Glasgow on 2:17pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Why are all the Nat supporters so bitter and malicious in their comments on this board?

Ironic as the Nats whinge about negative campaigning.

At the heart of the SNP is malice and dislike for others who don't agree with them. Very nationalistic. Inward looking and small minded.

The Nats are a party of the last century.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 2:21pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Absolute garbage. Compare this with Alex Salmond's profile article by the same author.

Anne Simpson, you should be ashamed of yourself. History is not easily airbrushed - as the 'Oil manifesto', now back in the spotlight - has proven.

Journalists like yourself are doing your own country no favours, they promote - out right - an administartion which cites dependancy first and their people second. Sickening.

Here's a fun exercise for peeps at home. Look at each article next to each other.

Now, in red pen ink those words that have a negative connotation.

Then, pen those words - in green ink - that have a positive connotation.

Voila - you've looked beyond the article and discovered how to 'spin' an article.

It's heartbreaking to see the Herald go the way of the Scotsman.

READERS: Compare the article - refer to 'The public Interest' on the Press Complaints Commission web site here - http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html .

Complain.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 2:25pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Malky - you're talking nonsense..

..and I'm afraid, the ongoing unionist obsession with painting anything that's pro-SNP as positively Jacobean, like a doomed romantic figure in one of Walter Scott's novels is in itself old hat.

No one buys it any more.

The CENTRAL point being, the SNP is about the future. Is about defining a future that's relevant - and involving - for all of Scotland.

Away and read your Daily Record.
Posted by: Alan Smart, Falkirk on 2:28pm Sat 21 Apr 07
All this drivel about people "forcing him to give up a 20 family friendship with Kirsty, kids seperated etc" -pass me a new labour sick bag.

Jack, nobody asked you to do any of this and you know it you dishonest person. All that was argued is that you should have declared this holiday gift in Holyrood's register of interests - just like every other MSP is expected to do. This was never about money - you and Bridgett on your £200k plus a year income harldy need a holiday feebie. It was about a huge conflict of interest. - you Scotland First Minister spending a holiday with a front line BBC political presnter, Holyrood building selection panel member, £1 million 'insider deal' documentary maker, and OWNER of these vital and withheld holyrood tapes.

Jack, you and Kirsty know fine well why ths holiday was not declared and it had nothing to do with meney. And keep you kids out of it.They are old enough now to know the caliber of the guy they call dad - or should at least now on reading the cynical way you have even put them inthe front line to help salage you pathetic career.

The tuth is out there, Watch this space
www.youscotland.com
Posted by: Malky, Glasgow on 2:37pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Mr Alan Smart - you appear to spend your life posting to various newspaper boards with the same personal grievance. Presumably you don't have much a life after your left your employment at the Parly? Are we bitter? If so, the Nats will welcome you on in.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 2:42pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Malky - your single obsession is to label ANYONE who has a nationalist opinion as a 'fanatic'.

Really? Do fanatics sanction illegal wars? Screw over pension funds? Guide the mass media?

Get a life you utter wastoid.

After all, one can only base opinions in an empirical manner.

That's by way of 'working example' Malky old boy - the working example of the Labour party is a second-rate Scotland. How *dare* we, as Scots, seek to better ourselves!
Posted by: Malky, Glasgow on 2:47pm Sat 21 Apr 07
We can only better ourselves by some daft desire to impose a border on a wee island?

I am Scottish pal, and let me explain how we live on a small ball of earth in a wee solar system in a ten a penny galaxy. We need to be international, not national.

Yet daftie Nats are fixated on Braveheart independence. Apparently its a cure for all ills. Problem is the Nat manifesto is full of half baked ideas. They don't have solutions for tough problems.

I look forward to Eck Salmond losing on 3 May and being sent hame to think again, and retire.
Posted by: Alan Smart, Falkirk on 2:52pm Sat 21 Apr 07
I am happily employed in the private sector thank you,, having been blaklisted by your mob for being too free thinking. An at this precise mo I am happily watching the cricket - i can spit and chew gum at the same time.

But mine's is no personal grievance, but a political one. So if you could now answer my point above please. Post below if you prefer , but you can even make the first very first post here. We don't belive in censorship ( where are these open Labour blogs?).

Go on write a stout defence of our honourable First Ministe atr.

http://www.youscotland.com/debate/showthread.php?p=418#post418

And dont believe all the tosh your paymasters will spin you about me.. I could eat anyone of them for breakfast and they know it. Indeed I will in onlne over the next 12 days.
Posted by: Clare, Labour Astroturf Dept. on 2:56pm Sat 21 Apr 07
I wholeheartedly concur with the esteemed gentleman known as "Malky".

The SNP's plans for separation will wrench Scotland from the surface of planet Earth and on to a direct collision course with Jupiter. Hard working families across Scotland will suffer the effects of the vacuum of space, deadly radiation, and worst of all, the SNP's black hole. This will drain hard working families of £5000 in order to pay for Alex Salmond's "Anti-gravity tax".

Only Labour can ensure Newtonian laws of gravitational attraction will help hard working families.
Posted by: Argentocoxus on 3:00pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Aye Malky, it's a sma' world, but ah widnae like tae paint it! An your a wee Malky - better tim some ashes oot in the close and run like h*** fur ye gie me the boak. Ah suppose you wahnt a galaxy government.
Posted by: Alan Smart, 171-340 on 3:00pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Oh and Malky - if you'd prefer a video to words try watching my
"The Best Wee Numpty in the World" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuvLVXXKt6I

Please pass it on
www.youscotland.com
Posted by: Malky, Glasgow on 3:09pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Alan Smart - have seen your site and video, and may I say it was toe curling, mickey mouse work. I presume your job in the private sector involves a bit of flipping. Can I have fries with that big mac? Cheers.
Posted by: Arranboy. on 3:24pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Thank god I don't pay for the Herald anymore. What a load of sycophantic bilge. I ditched the hootsmon years ago because it was utter pants and switched to the Herald which I also no longer buy as it is now out there on a planet beyond pants.
So what now for a quality Scottish newspaper?
Was it worth losing all those readers just to toe the New Labour line I wonder. I think the Herald realise they are commited now and they must run with it . Consequently the New Labour bias is now almost a parody and a once great paper has all but destroyed it's credibility with thousands of former readers.
Result for New Labour.
Result for the Herald.
Sad day for journalism in Scotland . Reap what you sow chaps.
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 3:32pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Malky, Malky, Malky

A daft wee border on a small island? That being the case, defining a border wouldn't be an issue for you at all? Huh?

You - in fact - resonate small-mindedness. What could be *more* small minded that writing off the very notion of development for your country? God - none are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free Malky old chap.

As an SNP supporter, it's ALL about the international. In the words of the fantastic Benjamin Franklin:

'...They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security...'

Oh - my internationalism does indeed extend into the heart of the cosmos - 'cos space is big, and cultures small - and unique. I savour them all.

FYI - I actually despise the 'Braveheart' independance you mention. I don't even know what that is - I can only assume you are truly misguided.

If Scotland were led by the SNP - or, at a later date, via independence - the 'Toatie Scone' vibe - as Tom Leonard states, would and should be out the window with all the tartan gonkiness you can paint .

The true story of the Gaels in Scotland, or the history of the country's struggles with England - for example - principally the Wars of Independance, *don't need* tartan to tell a gripping, and true series of stories.

Read Ronald McNair's Scotts 'Robert the Bruce - King of Scots' for a truly gripping tale - not in Black and White either.

As for the SNP not being able to create tough policies, your brow ridge obviously got in the way of the fact that the SNP have not even had the CHANCE to implement their policies. Now, I wouldn't exactly term policies 'albatrosses' or anything else, but all being fair - you cannot criticise what has not transpired.

Let's go hog wild. Here's a hunch. They might 'just' work. In fact, one could assume a great many of them will, less we're so different to other people and nations.

'hame to think again'. You really do have a cultural 'chip on the shoulder' eh?

Good for you.

But leave your pessimistic, leaching brand of dependancy at home - next to the very small window that peers on your all too short horizon.

That's not a very 'Scottish' set of ideals you have there - pal.

'...It is not the fact of liberty but the way in which liberty is exercised that ultimately determines whether liberty itself survives...'
Dorothy Thompson

'..We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home..'
Edward R. Murrow

And finally - just for you and your very, very, very small mind:

'..The only sure bulwark of continuing liberty is a government strong enough to protect the interests of the people, and a people strong enough and well enough informed to maintain its sovereign control over the government..'
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Posted by: JohnM on 3:33pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Malky says "I am Scottish pal"

You're British first though eh?
Posted by: Hugh Greenrocks, here, there, everywhere on 3:36pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Hear hear Malky - I've been holding my own against these numpties for days now.

Good to see there's someone else sane out there.

I mean, wid you look at this: "Do fanatics sanction illegal wars? (Yeah - Middle East v Israel, 1960s to the present day) Screw over pension funds? (did you know Robert Maxwell?) Guide the mass media? (And Mr Joe Stalin?)
"
Then this informed opinion is rounded off with the informed rejoinder: "Get a life you utter wastoid."

What are these people like?
Posted by: Alex Porter, Madrid on 3:40pm Sat 21 Apr 07
I wonder if what Alan Smart and others reckons of this idea:

The press's coverage of this election have been so bias as to be sinister. Is it not time to fight them there as well? There is obviosly a huge market for a newspaper that is balanced or has nationalist sympathies. Yes Alan, we know the web is becoming an alternative source of information but it's early days and a referendum could be a few years away. We NEED to break into the press market for Scotland's sake. Starting a new paper could work but would involve a lot of hard work. A better idea would be to buy an existing newspaper. They are all undervalued because of alienating the nationalist vote. So, there is a sound business case to be made for our rich pro-SNP backing entrepreneurs to move for one of the papers. The advertising money would soon follow from an SNP-run executive...

Am I wrong in thinking that the antics of the press, during this election campaign will have seriously annoyed some very powerful and influencial people?

Thoughts my freinds?
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 3:42pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Wow Hughie! You managed to answer yesterday's mailing - in a completely incomprehensible manner! Well done.

In case it just went straiiiight over yer head - isn't Blair and the Labour Party unique in having nailed ALL of those??

Go Labour Party.

Back to West-Blackhall Street Hughie old boy - the Daily Records are going fast and cheap! Just like the Labour Party!
Posted by: Cam3, Scotland on 3:44pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Funny that Alex - it's been playing on my mind for moons. Agree 100%

If we had anything approaching an even foot in this country, this tired old 'Labour cuz o' ma faither..' garbage would be honed down much quicker.

Alan? What to do?
Posted by: Hughie Greenock, Up south on 3:54pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Does no-one remember the Scottish Standard?

Launched to great fanafre and the tagline 'Scotland bites Back' this pro-independance papaer was supposed to give Scots a voice of their own and a direct alternative to the status quo tabloids.


It folded in seven weeks!

Not believe me? Check it out.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4483449.stm

Now if the nats couldn't run a newspaper without it crashing and burning.........

Posted by: david el escocés, Málaga on 3:54pm Sat 21 Apr 07
If all advertisers, businessmen etc who support the SNP decided not to place expensive adverts in newspapers with a strong anti-SNP bias until after the election, this MIGHT change things...but I doubt it.
Posted by: scotto voce, Glasgow on 4:20pm Sat 21 Apr 07
haven't read such a nauseatingly hagiographic 'profile' since Lorraine Davidson's book on Lucky Jack. Which CLP is Anne Simpson a member of? And bringing in the 'kids' (both in their 20s now) really scraping bottom of the barrel. Why no mention of at least some of the 'little difficulties' - Standards Committee enquiry (Lobbygate) and Christina Marshall scandal, the infamous NY kilt. We did, of course, get a passing mention of the mea culpa infidelity moment (the one he admitted to) , but only to pass him off as a 'decent' kind of, 'made a mistake, learned from it, hey I'm a pretty straight kind of guy'......... by the time I got to the late night dram with Chirac and Bush, while 'saving' the Malawian babies, I was alternating between nausea and hysteria. One can only hope this 'countryside loving'best small first minister in the world' gets more time on Arran after May 3rd. Hitherto, I have not been the kind of nationalist supporter who sees conspiracies behind every Herald column, but this profile really makes you wonder about their editorial judgement.
Posted by: Bluebell on 4:25pm Sat 21 Apr 07
Jack this is a very nice article and Anne Simpson has done you proud.
Sadly I think your job is unsafe whatever the outcome on May 3rd.
Gordon has given Wendy the green light and you my dear son of Arran and respected former maths teacher are as they say, toast.
Lately I don't think your heart was in it anyway.........